Ok, guys – this one was pretty heavy for a YA novel – tons to think about and chew over.
“You can’t change laws without first changing human nature.
You can’t change human nature without first changing the laws.”
-Neal Shusterman
*Caution, the post ahead is dark and full of spoilers – proceed at your own risk.*
The concept is strikingly simple yet unbelievably relevant to the battle today over women’s reproductive rights. In a not-so-distant future, another world war was fought and a deal struck surrounding reproductive rights. This deal was supposed to satisfy both sides: pro-life and pro-choice. Essentially, any baby conceived was bound to be born and kept alive until age 13. From 13 to 18 adolescents were able to be unwound (the decision being made by their parents, legal guardians, or the state – more on that in a minute). After they hit 18, they are no longer able to be unwound. Also, if they get pregnant (“uploaded”) they are also “safe”. Babies born MUST be kept alive so the options are to: keep your baby, give your baby up for adoption, leave it to be a ward of the state, or “stork” your baby (a horrifying practice where you abandon your baby on a stranger’s doorstep and run away – they open the door to find this baby and *poof* the baby is now legally theirs).
This has led to an abundance of babies and young children, a strain on the economy because the children given to the state all must be supported in state homes (StaHo) until 18 (or earlier – more on that in a minute), AND the added stress of wondering if you will wake up in the morning with another mouth to feed that was not of your own doing. Storked babies have as much of a chance of being passed from house to house, unwanted, as they do ending up in a family loved and actually cared for.
The new laws were intended to appease both sides and honor the sanctity of life, but instead they, ironically, cheapen life and turn children into commodities – chattel to be raised and sold as the need arises. Less than human, babies are almost worshipped, but only until age 13. And like the fading of their childhood into teen-hood, so fades their importance and stability – even amongst their own family with parents that supposedly love and want them. Teens are unwound for spare parts, because they are unruly or difficult (if you know a perfectly behaved teen, send them my way because I’d like to meet one that isn’t a hormone adled mess before I die), because they have something to gain, because they are donating them as 1/10th of their “riches” to the church, or because they are worth more unwound than alive in one piece. The adults placate themselves with the thought that the unwound aren’t truly dead – as if taking one of your children and chopping them up for spare part is ok as long as they are still considered neurologically alive.
The story follows 3 unwinds who, through design or circumstance, find themselves on the run from the law in an attempt to remain alive. Connor’s parents want to unwind him because he is an unruly 16 year old (news flash parents – if your kid is unruly to the point you want to END THEIR EXISTENCE, you may need to rethink your life choices…just sayin’). Risa was an abandoned ward of the state, chosen to be unwound when there was not enough funding to justify supporting a moderately talented teen when there are babies being surrendered every day that the government is bound to raise to age 13. Lev has been raised his entire life to be offered by his parents as a tithe to his church (parents who will adopt and take in storked babies, yet raise one of they birthed as a lamb to be slaughtered).
I had to sit down and think for some time before I was composed enough to write this review at all. Reading, I was pissed as hell. This book takes to completion some of the concepts we deal with on a daily basis in regards to women’s rights – kind of a “what if” to the extreme if you will. Like The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood, someone has to suffer in the face of changing laws. In this case, rather than fertile women, it’s the children who will do the sacrificing.
Well, clearly I have some strong feelings about this book y’all (were you actually surprised? I doubt it). The concept it covers is extremely relevant and hits WAAAAAAAAAAY to close to home (as both a woman and mother). First off, I really enjoyed both the story and writing style of Neal Shusterman. He broke the book down into chunks titled by the main characters names, which made it a quick read. The story itself was riveting, if disturbing, mostly because it isn’t too difficult to imagine people convincing themselves that something like this is a viable option. As the economy becomes more strained, and parents more stressed by parenting (and potentially having children added to their brood for them), it isn’t too hard to see how some might think unwinding their child would be morally acceptable, nay, their moral OBLIGATION to support their other children (especially if the unwind is considered a “problem child”). The Bill of Life didn’t actually serve to make life better for children or protect them – I argue that it actually made things worse for all in this fictional universe.
The part that hit me hardest, I think, was the story Connor tells about a baby that was storked to his family (FYI Connor’s parents – pretty sure the psychological trauma you inflicted on him with this one event is why he is so unruly and angry. If this is any indication of your parenting skills, it’s my guess his young life was full of instances that helped to usher in the breakdown of this family). The baby was left on his doorstep, but his family didn’t want it. Rather than bringing it to a StaHo, they waited and abandoned the baby on the doorstep of one of the neighbors. This was repeated until the baby wound up back on Connor’s doorstep so ill and uncared for that “he” died a short time later at the hospital. In a world where children were either worth money or were another expenditure, this baby had nothing to offer and was thrown away like so much trash. As a mother, I couldn’t fathom looking to unwind my own children (no matter how difficult they’re being – and we’ve had some wildcat moments) nor having a child wind up on my doorstep and not taking them in. My heart ached for this little fictional, dead baby.
Another hard-to-get-through section was the unwinding of a secondary character, Roland. It was described in detail (although not graphically) as he was disassembled, piece-by-piece. The most horrifying part was that unwinds are kept conscious and aware throughout the entire unwinding process – made to witness their own termination (although we come to see later that each of the bits of each person retains their own memory or sense of self)! How a population would think that THIS – sentencing a group of society to their own demise, which they are fully aware is coming and must be aware while it happens, is any better or different than the termination of all the pregnancies they adopted this law to prevent is such a “can’t see the forest through the trees” moment – I was/am flabbergasted.
I did find that there were some areas where the story seemed to drag a little bit for me – areas where there weren’t really anything big going on. After running to escape and moving to various safe houses with these three, arriving at the graveyard and having to slow down to the speed of everyday life was kind of a let down.
Again though, this is a YA novel and the author does an excellent job moving the story ahead, weaving in “history”, and making it accessible to the age group it’s intended for.
Do Connor, Risa, and Lev survive to their 18th birthdays? Is there a rebellion? Whose teeth does the admiral actually have in is mouth?!? For the answer to all these questions you will have to read to find out – you won’t be sorry you did!
Rating: 4/5